This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0275074009333175v1 0275074009333175v2    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Savitch, H. V. Articles by Ye, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond the Rhetoric: Lessons From Louisville’s Consolidation

¹ University of Louisville
² Roosevelt University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hank.savitch{at}louisville.edu.

	Abstract

Louisville’s consolidation with Jefferson County was the first large-scale merger to take place in the United States in more than 30 years. The authors examine this merger as a major institutional innovation that was supposed to enhance economic development. Proponents of consolidation claimed that institutional change would "shake up" the system and create an economic boom. The authors use actual results to determine whether this much-heralded experience warrants claims that it can be a role model, point of reference, or best practice. In doing this, they compare data from premerged and postmerged Louisville over a full 8-year period. Of central concern are whether "shake up" worked, how elites manage results as unsatisfying outcomes become apparent, and what that behavior portends for responsible governance. The authors conclude with a number of principles and policies regarding institutional change.

First published on March 26, 2009, doi:10.1177/0275074009333175
This version was published on April 8, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?