Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The American Review of Public Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Politicization and Responsiveness in the Regional Offices of the NLRB

Diane E. Schmidt

California State University, Chico

Societal, professional, and organizational pressures create opportunities in bureaucratic decision making for political forces to dominate policy implementation. The author examines regional decision making in the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Because earlier studies examine such decision making in NLRB regional offices from 1964 to 1986, they include no critical examinations of the impact of changes in partisan control, societal attitudes, the balance of power between employers and unions, and economic stability from 1986 to 1997. The author argues that these developments create important new constraints on the level of regional staff responsiveness and accountability to political interests. Using a dynamic model, the author examines the influence of national pressures, regional environmental influences, and previous decisions by regional staffs to dismiss and by clienteles to withdraw complaints. The results show that clienteles pursue cases strategically in response to expectations of favoritism from national forces, political strength at the regional level, and previous decisions and the contemporary success of opposing interests.

The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 32, No. 2, 188-215 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/02774002032002004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?