This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Karty, K. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Membership Balance, Open Meetings, and Effectiveness in Federal Advisory Committees

Affinnova, Inc.

This article attempts to measure the determinants of federal advisory committee (FAC) effectiveness, with special focus on membership balance and meeting openness. Although these two topics have dominated the legal literature on FACs, no study has provided quantitative estimates of their impact on committees. This article fills the gap by analyzing data from a General Accounting Office survey of committee members in 1998, and supplements this with evidence from individual interviews. It concludes that openness predictably impairs perceived committee effectiveness but that balanced membership improves perceived committee effectiveness. Moreover, it finds these effects comparable in magnitude to other major administrative variables that affect perceived committee effectiveness.

Key Words: advisory committee • transparency • balance • openness • credibility

The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 35, No. 4, 414-435 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0275074005277994


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?