This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Catlaw, T. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Authority, Representation, and the Contradictions of Posttraditional Governing

Arizona State University, Tempe

The social, economic, and political transformations of the last 30 years have ushered in a "posttraditional" order in which the institutions and practices of the past are no longer authoritative guides for action and thought. Human experience increasingly is conceived as something to be constructed and decided on without reliance on the authority of tradition. This essay argues that these transformations pose grave challenges to the mechanisms of political representation and administrative legitimacy because they frustrate the coherent production of both recognition of a "We the People" and the conditions for human subjectivity. In doing so, the efficacy of the conventional mechanisms of governmental authority is eroded. An alternative model of administrative practice is outlined that rests on a nonrepresentational mode of authority and a reconceptualization of democracy.

Key Words: legitimacy • the People • midwife • Jacques Lacan

The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 36, No. 3, 261-287 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0275074005283191


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?