This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, S. H. Articles by Smirnova, N. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Study Of Executive Budget-Balancing Decisions

Natalia V. Smirnova

New York City Office of Management and Budget

This article illustrates how chief executives approach deficit plan design. A decision model is developed that lays out the deficit-closing options and their cumulative impact on the multiple competing goals of minimizing political loss while maintaining long-term fiscal balance. The article analyzes the deficit-closing plans of New York City mayors from fiscal year 1981 to fiscal year 2004. The authors classify the nature of the deficit-closing options employed each year and the constraints associated with each option and investigate the political loss associated with alternative decisions. The findings suggest that in any given year, an attempt is made to achieve a balance between the long-term gains of structural budget balance and the loss of political support. Even in election years some semblance of balance is normally maintained, however, there is an attempt to hold down the total size of the deficit, thus reducing loss of political support.

Key Words: budget gap • government • New York City

The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 36, No. 3, 323-336 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0275074005280953


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?