This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0275074008314203v1 38/2/130    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Alford, J. Articles by Hughes, O. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management

University of Melbourne and the Australia and New Zealand School of Government

Owen Hughes

Monash University and Australia and New Zealand School of Government

New Public Management has now been "new" for more than 15 years, and public administration scholars are calling for new approaches, such as networked governance or collaboration. However, these approaches share with their predecessors the problem that they tend toward a one-best-way orientation. Instead, the authors argue, the next phase should be what they call "public value pragmatism." In other words, the best management approach to adopt depends on the circumstances, such as the value being produced, the context, or the nature of the task. They illustrate a decision framework for determining the most appropriate approach for different types of circumstances. The emerging literature also tends to be unclear about the level of the public sector to which it applies. The authors distinguish three levels—programs, organizations, and whole public sectors—and put forward some propositions about how public value pragmatism might apply at each level.

Key Words: public value • contingency theory • New Public Management • collaboration

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?