This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0275074008319217v1 39/3/304    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Carr, J. B. Articles by Karuppusamy, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond Ideal Types of Municipal Structure

Adapted Cities in Michigan

Wayne State University, jcarr{at}wayne.edu

Shanthi Karuppusamy

Wayne State University

Increasingly, scholars of local governments are calling attention to a new era of municipal reform and to the convergence of the mayor-council and council-manager forms of governments. A major conclusion of this literature is that these two familiar ideal types no longer adequately describe the structure of most American cities. This article contributes to this question by examining the charters of 263 Michigan cities. We use the adapted cities framework advanced by H. George Frederickson, Gary Johnson, and Curtis Wood to examine the patterns of adaptation to Michigan's mayor-council and council-manager cities. We find that the governance structure in most Michigan cities is not accurately described by either of the ideal types. Mayor-council cities are especially likely to use charter provisions that deviate significantly from conventional depictions of the form.

Key Words: mayor-council • council-manager • adapted cities • city charter • CAO • Michigan • reform

This version was published on May 1, 2009

The American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 39, No. 3, 304-321 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0275074008319217


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?